21’s View: Code is legislation, however human oversight is important.
“I consider in decentralization, however we’ve got to acknowledge that people are nonetheless a part of the equation. Sensible contracts don’t exist in a vacuum–builders construct them, and customers work together with them. We have to discover a stability between automation and accountability.”
He identified that true decentralization was meant to convey stability again to a system individuals now not trusted. But when DeFi fully removes human oversight, are we actually reaching stability — or simply shifting energy another way?
Glenn’s View: Code will not be legislation — authorized frameworks nonetheless apply.
“Ideally, we’d love for DeFi to be ruled purely by good contracts, however in actuality, governments don’t acknowledge code because the legislation. When issues go flawed, it’s not the good contract that determines legality — it’s the real-world authorized system.”
We pointed to the Mango Markets exploit, the place an attacker manipulated a protocol’s worth oracle to empty over $100 million, claiming it was a “worthwhile buying and selling technique.” But, authorized authorities noticed it as market manipulation, and the attacker now faces prices.
The takeaway?
Whereas code is legislation could be a guideline in DeFi, it doesn’t essentially align with how jurisdictions implement rules.
