Researching mining centralization in Bitcoin, I got here throughout Wownero’s solo-mining solely pool resistance. There don’t appear to exist any pool
mining Wownero as proven in miningpoolstats.stream.
Allow us to assume that Wownero’s thought of pool resistance features a lot traction that both
1. Bitcoin customers improve it with a tough fork that requires each mining consumer to supply the arguments resembling --receive-address {YOUR-ADDRESS} --secret-key {SECRET-SPENDKEY} to be able to begin mining, making Bitcoin pool-resistant
OR
2. Bitcoin customers improve it with the identical arduous fork as in 1 however the customers additionally change the mining algorithm to the ASIC-resistant RandomX.
In both of those instances some states now transfer to the competion stage, trying to
receive nearly all of hashpower to be able to censor.
In case 1 the states do it by working tax-subsidized ASIC
farms. The states initially confiscate ASICS from exisiting miners,
purchase ASICs on the free market, and at last subsidize additionally the manufacturing of
ASICS.
In case 2 some states could power their residents to make use of distributions
for desktop computer systems resembling deepin that might include the mining software program
with authorities receiving handle and the corressponding personal key hardcoded into it.
The mining course of on such computer systems could be tremendous tailor-made to consumer’s exercise,
e.g. a script working on within the background on a laptop computer would detect if the facility cable is plugged in.
Mining software program would solely begin mining when not on battery energy (this
to keep away from public discontent and productiveness loss). Desktop PCs that aren’t laptops would maybe be obliged
to run extra aggressive mining operations. Within the West, the governments could power company distributors of working programs to incorporate miners preinstalled, be such programs proprietary (Home windows, Apple) or free as within the case of PopOS.
In both of two instances the proceeds from mining (the coinbase transaction and within the case of not
choosing mining empty blocks some whitemarket transaction charges) are meant for use by attacking states to
subsidize additional subsidize the assault. That isn’t at all times the case. In case 1 some operators of the ASIC-farms
steal the proceeds (the states could attempt to counteract this by granting financial advantages for trustworthy mining-farm operators).
In case 2 each laptop savvy particular person can simply ship this Bitcoin to themselves.
My questions:
1. How does the assault floor change for Bitcoin in case 1 and in 2?
What are different methods of assault that I didn’t describe?
2. How does safety of holding Bitcoin modifications for non-attacking black market miners.
Everyone who has sufficient entry to their PC to run “ps aux|grep -i bitcoind” can now get their personal key.
They might ,for the sake of saving on transaction charges, use the identical pockets for mining and for spending.
3. Given the excessive variance of reward in solo mining because the end result low blockrate of Bitcoin, are
cash resembling Kaspa, which have excessive (1-10 per second) block emission price, advantaged as being black market cash
because of their functionality of providing decrease variance of reward to their miners?
4. What have I missed in my evaluation?
