taproot – non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Invalid Schnorr signature)

I am making an attempt to inscribe a Switch of BRC-20 ship an quantity of Bitcoin from and to a single tackle. Would this doable?

Sure you’ll be able to pay from an tackle again to the identical tackle, although clearly you must make an allowance for a charge, so the returned quantity is much less otherwise you want an additional enter to cowl the charge.

This isn’t what’s implied by the error message. It’s not the supply of your downside creating a sound Schnorr signature.

    const script = [
        pubkey.toString("hex"),
        "OP_CHECKSIG",
        "OP_0",
        "OP_IF",
        toHexString(ec.encode("ord")),
        "01",
        toHexString(mimetype),
        "OP_0",
        toHexString(content),
        "OP_ENDIF",
    ].be part of(" ");
    const leafScript = bitcoin.script.fromASM(script);

I am unfamiliar with this Javascript .fromASM operate. Presumably it provides the suitable opcodes for the implicit information pushes? For instance the pubkey.toString("hex"), has to ultimately be prefixed with opcode 0x20 because the opcode for pushing 32-bytes. I would verify what .fromASM produces.

I am additionally puzzled by ec.encode("ord") – it appears to be changing a UTF-8 string to UTF-8 until your supply is definitely in some encoding that isn’t a superset of 7-bit ASCII.

My understanding of the community encoding of the related script is at Easy methods to differentiate between BTC transactions and BRC20 transactions on a blockchain?